Comments on: New & Improved Flex/Flash Data Binding http://xtyler.com/code/20 a developer's blog. Tue, 19 Apr 2011 14:30:37 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: Thoughts On Sproutcore and App Dev In General « lukesh +interactive http://xtyler.com/code/20/comment-page-1#comment-11863 Thoughts On Sproutcore and App Dev In General « lukesh +interactive Sat, 02 Jan 2010 15:35:10 +0000 http://www.xtyler.com/?p=20#comment-11863 [...] have the advantage of not being the first in that they can fix all the things that Adobe has done wrong. It all looks really promising except for a few things, which I’ll discuss in a [...] [...] have the advantage of not being the first in that they can fix all the things that Adobe has done wrong. It all looks really promising except for a few things, which I’ll discuss in a [...]

]]> By: xtyler http://xtyler.com/code/20/comment-page-1#comment-11502 xtyler Tue, 17 Feb 2009 23:07:42 +0000 http://www.xtyler.com/?p=20#comment-11502 Both data binding solutions have just been <a href="http://www.xtyler.com/code/177" rel="nofollow">released</a>. The first one I built was never publicly available until now - but I highly recommend Flight's <code>Bind</code> solution over the proxy wrapper around <code>BindingUtils</code>, as it increases memory and slows performance on top of Flex's already-slow bindings. The new AS3-only solution works seamlessly with Flex and has memory/performance improvements on top of the weak-reference feature. Both data binding solutions have just been released. The first one I built was never publicly available until now – but I highly recommend Flight’s Bind solution over the proxy wrapper around BindingUtils, as it increases memory and slows performance on top of Flex’s already-slow bindings. The new AS3-only solution works seamlessly with Flex and has memory/performance improvements on top of the weak-reference feature.

]]> By: xtyler Custom Binding Released! http://xtyler.com/code/20/comment-page-1#comment-11501 xtyler Custom Binding Released! Tue, 17 Feb 2009 22:05:46 +0000 http://www.xtyler.com/?p=20#comment-11501 [...] as promised. It has a smaller memory footprint, a faster clock-speed and, best of all, it’s 100% [...] [...] as promised. It has a smaller memory footprint, a faster clock-speed and, best of all, it’s 100% [...]

]]> By: Greg Baker http://xtyler.com/code/20/comment-page-1#comment-11423 Greg Baker Sat, 07 Feb 2009 16:43:58 +0000 http://www.xtyler.com/?p=20#comment-11423 I too am interested in your solution. This was to be fixed in Gumbo > 4.0.0.4330 ... but seams not. I am using the Mate framework and a Presentation design pattern with lots of module loads/unloads. This problem is a big pain. I did not find your previous solution "...a wrapper class to Flex’s BindingUtils." Anyway, I would be interested in this to try with our modular application(s). -- Thank you. I too am interested in your solution. This was to be fixed in Gumbo > 4.0.0.4330 … but seams not. I am using the Mate framework and a Presentation design pattern with lots of module loads/unloads. This problem is a big pain. I did not find your previous solution “…a wrapper class to Flex’s BindingUtils.” Anyway, I would be interested in this to try with our modular application(s). — Thank you.

]]> By: xtyler http://xtyler.com/code/20/comment-page-1#comment-10817 xtyler Tue, 27 Jan 2009 15:13:04 +0000 http://www.xtyler.com/?p=20#comment-10817 Thanks for the input Jonathan! The Flight Framework with which the data binding will be shipped is an open source library. You can include the .swc or classes (in part or in full) in any project and pick and choose what utilities you want to take advantage of. The only requirement under the MIT license is that the license itself, copyright and credits, remain intact within the source code. Thanks for the input Jonathan! The Flight Framework with which the data binding will be shipped is an open source library. You can include the .swc or classes (in part or in full) in any project and pick and choose what utilities you want to take advantage of. The only requirement under the MIT license is that the license itself, copyright and credits, remain intact within the source code.

]]> By: Jonathan @ JADBOX.COM http://xtyler.com/code/20/comment-page-1#comment-10791 Jonathan @ JADBOX.COM Tue, 27 Jan 2009 06:02:53 +0000 http://www.xtyler.com/?p=20#comment-10791 Any chance of this utility being released my itself without the framework attached? This would be valuable in even small projects. Email me if you need a beta tester. :) Any chance of this utility being released my itself without the framework attached? This would be valuable in even small projects. Email me if you need a beta tester. :)

]]> By: Michael Hoisie http://xtyler.com/code/20/comment-page-1#comment-10100 Michael Hoisie Tue, 13 Jan 2009 23:42:32 +0000 http://www.xtyler.com/?p=20#comment-10100 I'm also looking forward to this code being available :) My projects generally don't use the flex framework, so it would be nice to have some data binding mechanism. I’m also looking forward to this code being available :) My projects generally don’t use the flex framework, so it would be nice to have some data binding mechanism.

]]> By: xtyler http://xtyler.com/code/20/comment-page-1#comment-10087 xtyler Mon, 12 Jan 2009 23:04:35 +0000 http://www.xtyler.com/?p=20#comment-10087 Jim and Andre - Both binding solutions will be available with the release of the Flight Framework, an MVC application framework. I'll be the first to post when that's available, it's undergoing final documentation. Jim and Andre – Both binding solutions will be available with the release of the Flight Framework, an MVC application framework. I’ll be the first to post when that’s available, it’s undergoing final documentation.

]]> By: xtyler http://xtyler.com/code/20/comment-page-1#comment-10086 xtyler Mon, 12 Jan 2009 23:03:03 +0000 http://www.xtyler.com/?p=20#comment-10086 Alan - cleaning up after yourself is by far the best policy. Some systems are large and complex and it can be hard to track the many points of failure, so a better binding solution is convenient and can save time and money. Alan – cleaning up after yourself is by far the best policy. Some systems are large and complex and it can be hard to track the many points of failure, so a better binding solution is convenient and can save time and money.

]]> By: Andre http://xtyler.com/code/20/comment-page-1#comment-10084 Andre Mon, 12 Jan 2009 15:09:52 +0000 http://www.xtyler.com/?p=20#comment-10084 Hey, cool stuff =) I just ran into a problem with mx:Binding tags in loaded Modules which prevented the Module from beeing garbage collected. Your Solution is obvioulsy the most elegant one. Can you send me your code or an swc lib? would be very much appreciated! Hey,

cool stuff =) I just ran into a problem with mx:Binding tags in loaded Modules which prevented the Module from beeing garbage collected.
Your Solution is obvioulsy the most elegant one. Can you send me your code or an swc lib? would be very much appreciated!

]]>